Legal Opinion
James Hartman v. Beary Bowles
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2022No. 21-1365PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1365 ___________________________ James Hartman; Ryan Hartman Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Beary Bowles, Detective Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: December 16, 2021 Filed: July 5, 2022 [Published] ____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Does a detective violate a clearly established constitutional right by omitting information from a warrant…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Messerschmidt v. MillenderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Estate of Donald Nash v. Henry FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Henry Howe v. Steven GilpinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Rebecca Nichols v. James Swindoll and Chuck GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
- Rebecca Nichols v. James Swindoll and Chuck GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
- Cement Masons, Plasterers and Shophands Service Corporation v. Quality Coatings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.