Legal Opinion

Continental Supply Co. v. White

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932No. 6,911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The Davis Supply Company, a corporation, G. R. Nadeau and Ralph Chamberlain have separately appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Continental Supply Company, foreclosing a lien against certain oil-well casing acquired by appellants and obtained by them from H. P. White and J. E. Winther.

In May, 1929, White and Winther commenced drilling operations under a lease held by the former on certain lands in Liberty county; they purchased certain casing and other necessary supplies from the plaintiff on credit. The well was completed in July, at which time the operators were owing to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Klind v. Valley County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1924

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hostetter v. Inland Dev. Corp. of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Walsh-Anderson Company v. KellerMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Farmer's Feed & Supply Co. v. Industrial Leasing Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Blose v. Havre Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Oil Well Supply Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WinfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API