Legal Opinion

Washington Post Co. v. Chaloner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 12, 1917No. 3025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Hearing on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supremo Court of the District of Columbia, on verdict, in an action of libel. The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This is an action for libel.

Read the full summary

Hearing on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supremo Court of the District of Columbia, on verdict, in an action of libel. The Court in the opinion stated the facts as follows: This is an action for libel. The article complained of ivas published by tlie defendant in the Washington Post of April 3, 1909, and is, as pleaded: “John Armstrong Chai oner (Chanler) (meaning the plaintiff) brother of Lewis Stuyvesant Chaulei-, of New York, and former husband of Amelio Rives, the authoress, now Princess Troubetskoy, is recuperating at Shade-land, the country home of Major Thomas L.…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Smyth

The first question presented is whether or not the publication was ás a matter of law libelous per se. This is foreclosed by *71our decision on tbe fonncr appeal, which was binding on tlio lower court and is equally binding on this court, as the law of ihe case. The circumstances in which the subject was first presented to us have not been changed. The language construed in the declaration at that time and from which we drew the legal conclusion that it was libelous per se is the same language upon which we are asked to pass judgment now. "Where this is so, the former judgment must be treated as…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Smith v. Vulcan Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Illinois v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Washington Sportservice, Inc. v. The M. J. Uline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. Washington Sportservice, Inc. v. The M. J. Uline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API