Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Hillsdale County Board of Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 41,027PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill for a mandatory injunction and to recover damages against defendants. Later, plaintiff filed a supplemental bill alleging he had filed an original bill for a mandatory injunction against defendants to remove stone, earth and other debris used in filling up and stopping an outlet to a certain drain across plaintiff’s lands and across a certain highway set'forth in his bill of complaint so that he might have the free and uninterrupted use of the drain and the outlet thereof, asking that defendants be perpetually enjoined from interfering with the drain of plaintiff or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Morrill v. Mackman.Michigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Arimond v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Bennett v. County of EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mertz v. J. M. Covington Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API