Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gallant v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 2002Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

Respectfully, I dissent.

The majority relies on Tripson v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 773 A.2d 195 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 568 Pa. 690, 796 A.2d 320 (2002). I believe that Tripson was wrongly decided.1 Additionally, assuming arguendo, the validity of the Tripson decision, the case sub judice is factually distinguishable such that Tripson does not control our determination of this matter.

I. Tripson was wrongly decided

In Tripson, the Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) suspended the motor vehicle…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. JOHNSONS v. Peoples Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Mazurek v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Koterba v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API