Gallant v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge COHN.
Respectfully, I dissent.
The majority relies on Tripson v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 773 A.2d 195 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 568 Pa. 690, 796 A.2d 320 (2002). I believe that Tripson was wrongly decided.1 Additionally, assuming arguendo, the validity of the Tripson decision, the case sub judice is factually distinguishable such that Tripson does not control our determination of this matter.
I. Tripson was wrongly decided
In Tripson, the Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) suspended the motor vehicle…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- JOHNSONS v. Peoples Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Mazurek v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Koterba v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.