Lee v. Lee
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s ruling that the parties’ separation agreement bars her claim for equitable distribution and alimony. We hold that plaintiff breached the separation agreement and, accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial.
Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s finding of fact that the plaintiff’s loan of $102,000 to Edenton was not an asset owned by plaintiff. We hold that the monies owed plaintiff pursuant to his loan to Edenton was an asset which he was obligated, under the separation agreement, to disclose to defendant.
Pursuant to G.S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Blount v. BlountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Cator v. CatorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Herring v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Olympus Managed Health Care, Inc. v. American Housecall Physicians, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Mack Financial Services v. L3 Trucking LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020