Legal Opinion

Pitzen v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2004No. D043592PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

This case requires us to consider whether a plaintiff in a small claims court action may relitigate, in a subsequent related action, an issue litigated and expressly decided against him in the small claims action. We conclude that such relitigation is precluded where the record is sufficiently clear as to the issue actually litigated and decided in the small claims court.

II

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In April 2002 real party in interest Rich Garcia was driving a car in which Brian O’Dea was a passenger. Garcia got into an accident with another car driven by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sandoval v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Superior Wheeler Cake Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Perez v. City of San BrunoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Clusiau v. Clusiau Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Sanders v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Fox v. California Franchise Tax BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Aryeh v. CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API