Lorntsen v. Union Fisherman's Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Clatsop: James A. Eaisin, Judge. This is an action by H. M. Lorntsen against the Union Fisherman’s Co-operative Packing Company, a corporation. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Submitted on briefs without argument, under the proviso of Supreme Court Rule 18: 56 Or. 622 (117 Pac. xi). In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
There is no issue of fact in the case at hand. The answer discloses that the defendant was incorporated under the general laws of this state October 13, 1896, with perpetual duration, having its principal office at Astoria, Oregon, and for the purpose, among other things, of pickling and canning salmon on the Columbia River. It has upward of a quarter of a million dollars invested in the enterprise, and has built up an annual business of $750,000, extending all over the civilized world, all under the name of Union Fishermen’s Co-operative Packing Company, as designated in its articles of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- State v. RedmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Liggett v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Fishermen's Co. v. ShoemakerOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Chan Sing v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Staples Coal Co. v. City Fuel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- First Nat. Bank v. Multnomah State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Pacific Title & Trust Co. v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.