Clark v. Housing Authority Etc.

Plaintiff, who is an attorney at law, instituted this action against defendant municipal corporation and one R. W. Watt, who is now an attorney for defendant, for restoration as a returned serviceman to his position as attorney for defendant under the provisions of Rem. Supp. 1943, § 10758-3 (Laws of 1941, chapter 201, p. 592, § 1, as amended by Laws of 1943, chapter 274, p. 353, § 1), which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

“Any man or woman who is a resident of this state, and who . . . shall hereafter become a member of the United States army, . . . and who has been or shall be called…