Legal Opinion

Scott v. Pepsi Cola Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1995No. S-95-399PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Pepsi Cola Company and Lumbermens Mutual Company appeal from an award entered by the Workers’ Compensation Court in favor of Todd Scott. The trial court was not persuaded that lack of notice was a defense in the case, and the court opined that Pepsi and Lumbermens were not prejudiced by the delay in the reporting of the injury. The review panel found that Scott had given proper notice under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-133 (Reissue 1993). Pepsi and Lumbermens appealed from the order of the review panel, and under the authority granted to us by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 1994) to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Hometown Communications, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Records v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brewer v. BrewerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Thompson v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kerkman v. Weidner Williams Roofing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Starks v. Cornhusker Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Snipes v. VickersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Zessin v. Shanahan Mechanical & Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API