In re the City of New York

A reargument as to Damage Parcels .Hos. 8, 30 and 31 is sought by the counsel for the city on the *269ground that my attention was not called to certain important decisions of the appellate court which he claims were overlooked in the opinion which was handed down, and that such decisions are controlling in the matter and sustain the position contended for by him. It is stated in his brief that “ the opinion seems to proceed upon the theory that the -commissioners of estimate and assessment, in estimating the damage, cannot take into consideration the uses for which the property is taken, or, in…