La Favor v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The Industrial Commission determined that Mr. La Favor was functioning as an independent contractor at the time of his accident, and we believe that the record fully sustains such conclusion. The commission did not make an express finding that Mr. La Favor was not an employee at the time of the accident, but such determination is reasonably implicit in its order.
This appeal requires that we examine the nature of the services performed by the applicant in his two different capacities. In one he was an employee and in the other an independent contractor.
Mr. La Favor’s duties as an employee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphy Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Pinson v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Claim of Vance v. Hut Neckwear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Sweatt v. Rutherford County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Claim of Johnston v. International Freighting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Way of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981