Legal Opinion

In re Demoruelle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 24, 2009No. 2008-B-2356PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

11This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, John E. Demoruelle. For the reasons that follow, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years.

INTRODUCTION

The procedural history of this case is somewhat complicated. In March 2004, the ODC filed two counts of formal charges against respondent. The formal charges alleged that respondent neglected legal matters, failed to communicate with his clients, failed to file annual accountings for a trust of which he served as trustee, and made…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. In re DemoruelleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API