Legal Opinion

Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 1984No. 84-1371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A corporate independent contractor which prevails in an action to recover bonuses promised for early completion of a construction project is not entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 448.08, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorizes such fees where an “employee” prevails in an action to recover “unpaid wages.” See Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company, 54 Cal.App.3d 140, 126 Cal.Rptr. 445 (1975) (wages as used in a statute refers to compensation for labor performed by an employee rather than by an independent contractor).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Singer Products, Inc. v. Tecnecol, Ltda.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993