Legal Opinion

Brodrib v. Doberstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 9, 1928PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The defendant was the lessee of certain premises occupied by him as a lunch room. The premises were sold by his lessor to the plaintiff and the defendant moved out. Several days later the plaintiff started to take off certain awnings which were on the front of the building. The defendant protested, claiming that the awnings belonged to him by virtue of the fact that when he purchased the business from his predecessor the awnings went with it. The plaintiff notwithstanding this removed the awnings and later when defendant demanded them, refused to return them. The defendant made complaint to a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Schippel v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API