Legal Opinion

Maxcy v. Peavey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

• It is undisputed that the defendant executed the notes in question, but it is claimed by defendant that his liability was not absolute and that it was conditional only; and that since the notes never passed out of the hands of the payee, they are subject to all defenses against any claim arising out of a non-negotiable contract.

It is urged, and much "authority is cited for the proposition, that notes bearing on their face a binding obligation may be shown to have been delivered conditionally and that they should not take effect until the happening of some specified event, without the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clausen v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gilman v. DruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Slocum v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Citizens Bank of Clinton v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Blum Bros. Box Co. v. StumbaughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API