United States v. Irey
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur with the court’s judgment that Irey’s sentence must be vacated but dissent as to the instruction that the district court sentence Irey to 30 years’ imprisonment. I write separately because in reaching this result, the court asks the wrong question and gives the wrong answer. Today’s decision cements this circuit’s approach to one of the most difficult questions posed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 404, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005): what is the proper role of the courts of appeals now that the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.