Legal Opinion

People v. North

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 2003No. A097247PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

California’s sex offender registration statute requires offenders who have no residence to register in the jurisdiction where they are “located” within five working days of changing their “location,” and give the authorities written notice of their new “location.” (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(1)(A) and (f)(1).1) In this case, an offender convicted of violating these requirements contends the terms “located” and “location” are unconstitutionally vague.

After careful consideration of the disputed language in its statutory context, and in light of its legislative purpose, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. State of Alabama v. Thornal Lee Adams.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. PoageColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. AnninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API