Legal Opinion

People v. Annin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 2004No. A099237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

Raymond Annin (appellant) appeals his conviction for violating Penal Code section 290, subdivision (f)(1). 1 The court also found true allegations that he had four prior convictions qualifying as strikes under the “Three Strikes” law, and found true an enhancement pursuant to section 667.5. The court denied his motion to strike one or more of the strike priors, and sentenced him to a term of 25 years to life, plus one year for the enhancement.

Appellant raises numerous issues on appeal, including challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, several claims of instructional…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VillegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. Camacho CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API