Legal Opinion · Dissent

Michigan State Employees Ass'n v. Civil Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1985No. Docket 73710Published

1DissentDanhof, C.J.

I respectfully dissent on the issue of contracting out.

At issue here is the constitutionality of defendants’ approval of an additional standard for allowing personal service contracts. Const 1963, art 11, § 5, does not specify under what circumstances the state may contract for services rather than having them performed by the classified civil service. It does provide that "[t]he classified state civil service shall consist of all positions in the state service [with certain specified exceptions]”. For some time, the commission has been of the view that "positions” includes, in part,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Michigan Ass'n of Governmental Employees v. Michigan Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API