Legal Opinion

In Re the Unauthorized Practice of the Law by McCallum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1936No. C.D. 2160. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is a proceeding in contempt, original in this court, instituted by the petition of a committee of the Washington State Bar Association organized under the provisions of chapter 94, Laws of 1933, p. 397 (Rem. 1933 Sup., §138-1 [P. C. §192-21] et seq.), charging the defendant, W. G. McCallum, with having engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. The cause has been submitted upon the petition and the defendant’s answer supported in essential particulars by an affidavit in response to a show cause order issued on the filing of the petition.

Substantially, the facts are as follows:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paul v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In re the Application to Hold Frederick Bugasch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gardner v. ConwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State v. YishmaelWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Bessemer Bar Ass'n v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. In re New York County Lawyers Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API