Legal Opinion

Dane Taylor v. J. Smith, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02060Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANE TAYLOR, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 26-CV-2060 : J. SMITH, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM COSTELLO, J. MAY 6, 2026 Plaintiff Dane Taylor, who is currently confined at SCI Phoenix, brings this pro se action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated. The Court will grant Taylor’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and will screen his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). As explained below, the Court will dismiss the Complaint, but Taylor will be permitted an opportunity…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API