Legal Opinion

Latham v. Continental Oil Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1980No. CIV-79-1089-DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs originally filed this action in the District Court of Washita County, Oklahoma, seeking to cancel a certain oil and gas lease owned by Defendant covering a tract of Plaintiffs’ land in Washita County described as the SW/4 of Section 4, Township 8 North, Range 19 West I.M. Defendant removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 and asserts that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy. Plaintiffs and Defendant have submitted this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kugel v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Ellison v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Petroleum Engineers Producing Corp. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. John G. Hove, Also Known as J. G. Hove, and Irma M. Hove v. Charles S. AtchisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API