Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kotila v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2003No. 2000-SC-0341-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKeller, Justice

Although I agree with the majority’s holding that Appellant’s Manufacturing Methamphetamine conviction must be reversed for a new trial because of the erroneous jury instruction, I write separately because I disagree with the majority’s Part IV(B) conclusion that the trial court properly denied Appellant’s request for a lesser-included offense instruction as to Criminal Attempt to Manufacture Methamphetamine. The majority recognizes that KRS 506.010 creates liability for attempts to commit criminal offenses but holds that the trial court properly denied to give Appellant’s requested…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitmoreKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kotila v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  5. CATERPILLAR, INC. v. BrockKentucky Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API