Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald McAllister

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 1, 1991No. 90-1741PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

The United States, with the personal approval of the Solicitor General, appeals pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)(2) on the grounds that the sentence in this criminal case was imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines. Inasmuch as we are deciding the case as a matter of law by construction of the guidelines, we are exercising plenary review. United States v. Nottingham, 898 F.2d 390, 392 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Ortiz, 878 F.2d 125, 126-27 (3d Cir.1989).

The procedural history and facts of this case are not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Angel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Dale M. Preston, A/K/A Jami Mansour ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Steven L. ParsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Robert McQuilkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Keithroy JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API