Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kepsel v. McCready & Sons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1956No. Docket 63, Calendar 46,653PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1DissentReid, J.

On leave granted, defendants appeal from an order of the workmen’s compensation appeal board granting an award for- compensation to plaintiff. The plaintiff and defendant McCready & Sons were subject to compensation law, and the defendant Michigan Mutual Liability Company assumed the risk. The employer, McCready, had notice and knowledge of the alleged injury .within the time required by statute. The only question involved is, did-plaintiff sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment as a bride-layer f

Plaintiff lives at Indian River, Michigan, is married, has 4…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. May v. AH Powell Lumber CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coombe v. PenegorMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hammons v. City of Highland Park Police DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lombardi v. William Beaumont HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Coombe v. PenegorMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API