Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Duane Hunt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1991No. 88-3222PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The government petitioned for rehearing, urging that our opinion published at 893 F.2d 1028 (9th Cir.1990), misapplied the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Michael Duane Hunt petitioned for rehearing, inviting this court to reconsider the applicability of good faith reliance by the police on an administrative warrant. We grant the government’s petition and deny the defendant’s petition.

Our original opinion found the § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) enhancement inapplicable to Hunt because his Oregon conviction was not “burglary” within the meaning of ACCA. Taylor v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. Michael Duane HuntCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Margarito Salmon, Magdalena Salmon, Individually and as Next Friend for Margarito Salmon, Jr. v. Martin R. Schwarz and Arturo A. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. James Allen StrahlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Gregory Stuart GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. David A. WielingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API