Legal Opinion
VierraMoore, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 15, 2013No. 2:12-cv-01926-MCE-EFBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., Chief Judge.
This matter arises out of Defendant Continental Casualty Company’s (“Defendant” or “Continental”) motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff VierraMoore, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “VierraMoore”). (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff opposes the motion. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.1
BACKGROUND2
A. Factual Background
VierraMoore is a management and consulting firm which provided property man*1273agement services to Linwood Owners Association ("Linwood"). (First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), ECF No. 12 ¶ 6.) In…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.