Legal Opinion

Talbott v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 18, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was argued before Alvey, C. J., Irving, Eowler, McSherry, and Bryan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The question to be decided in this case arises upou an appeal from a pro forma order of the Baltimore City Court, directing a mandamus to issue against the Insurance Commissioner of the State commanding him to issue a license to The Fidelity and Casualty Company, of New York *539to do business in this State. It is especially interesting and important, as it involves a question of comity between the States, and a construction of the statutes of this State and of New York State, in relation to each other. The case has been argued with very great ability by the counsel on both sides, and by the aid…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fine v. MoranSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. State ex rel. O'Brien v. Continental InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. State Insurance Commissioner v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Bie v. SwopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. Clay v. Dixie Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API