Legal Opinion

Lyon v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1900No. Appeal, No. 332PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 332, Jan. T., 1899, by contestant, from decree of Special Court, Schuylkill Co., as of C. P. Jan. T., 1896, No. 262, in election contest of Thomas H. B. Lyon v. P. M. Dunn. Election contest before special court. Motion to quash appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mitchell,

This is an appeal from the judgment of a special court of common pleas for the county of Schuylkill, commissioned for the trial of a contested election to the office of president judge of the orphans’ court of Schuylkill county.

The only question now before us is the right of appeal raised by a motion to quash.

*91Contests of elections are wholly statutory and no appeal lies from the judgment of the trial court, unless expressly authorized. The present contest was instituted by petition of certain electors to the attorney general and the appointment of a special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Election CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Carpenter's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. May v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Livesley v. LandonOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Forty-Sixth WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API