Legal Opinion

Cesar Munoz v. State of Oregon; Jacob (“Dale”) McKinney; Warren G. Roberts; Joseph Bugher; and John Does 1-20

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 14, 2025No. 6:22-cv-01348Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CESAR MUNOZ, Case No. 6:22-cv-1348-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. STATE OF OREGON; JACOB (“DALE”) MCKINNEY; WARREN G. ROBERTS; JOSEPH BUGHER; and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants. Juan C. Chavez and Walter F. Fonseca, OREGON JUSTICE RESOURCE CENTER, PO Box 5248, Portland, OR 97208. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Dan Rayfield, Oregon Attorney General; Nathaniel Aggrey, Robert E. Sullivan, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, OR 97301. Of Attorneys for Defendants State of Oregon and Jacob McKinney. Jonathan W.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API