Legal Opinion

Snip v. City of Lamar

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDEVENTER, J.-

This is a suit for specific performance. It was originally filed in four counts. The first count alleged that the plaintiffs were the owners of a 375 acre farm situated in Barton County, Missouri (giving the legal description) and alleged that Muddy Creek flowed through the lands from east to west. That to the north of Muddy Creek was approximately 100 acres and that all the improvements were on the south of said creek. That the City of Lamar is a city of the Fourth Class. Prior to' the year of 1937, it obtained t^.e water supply from Muddy Creek and had built a series of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. DimmittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Missouri Service Co. v. City of StanberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Kansas City v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Williams v. Moniteau National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Bassett v. GloverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. ZykanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Dill v. Poindexter Tile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Grauf v. City of SalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. ABA Distributors, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API