Legal Opinion

Missouri Service Co. v. City of Stanberry

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

This suit was brought by the Missouri Service Company and eight individual plaintiffs, as taxpayers, to enjoin the performance of a contract entered into between the city of Stanberry and Fairbanks-Morse Construction Company, whereby the latter agreed to construct a plant and system for the generation and distribution of electric energy in said city, for a certain compensation agreed upon to be paid by the city. The court below granted temporary injunction. Upon the trial of the cause the court rendered decree dissolving the injunction and dismissing plaintiffs’ bill. The plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. St. Louis Gaslight Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Laclede Construction Co. V. T. J. Moss Tie Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Hager v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hudson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  5. Kansas Electric Power Co. v. City of EurekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. Arkansas-Missouri Power Corp. v. City of KennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Mathison v. Public Water Supply District No. 2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Rollings Construction, Inc. v. Tulsa Metropolitan Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API