Legal Opinion

Truesdell v. Friedlander

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 9, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00066Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT PHILLIP TRUESDELL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil No. 3:19-cv-00066-GFVT ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ERIC FRIEDLANDER, et al., ) & ) Defendants. ORDER ) ) ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. [R. 98; R. 105; R. 107.] For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff Legacy Medical Transport, LLC’s motion for summary judgment [R. 105] will be DENIED, Defendant Eric Friedlander’s motion for summary judgment as to subject matter jurisdiction [R. 98]…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API