State v. Fowers
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MeHUGH, Associate Presiding Judge:
{1 William Eli Fowers appeals from his conviction of one count of eriminal solicitation. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-208 (2008). Fowers argues that defense counsel was ineffective in introducing evidence of Fowers's twenty-five-year-old conviction for sodomy on a child and for failing to move for a mistrial in response to the prosecutor's comment during closing argument suggesting a relationship between Fowers's bisexuality and pedophilia. Fowers also argues that the trial court committed plain error and that defense counsel was ineffective in allowing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GentryUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MunguiaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. KelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. EkstromCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.