Legal Opinion

State v. Fowers

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 10, 2011No. 20090787-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MeHUGH, Associate Presiding Judge:

{1 William Eli Fowers appeals from his conviction of one count of eriminal solicitation. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-208 (2008). Fowers argues that defense counsel was ineffective in introducing evidence of Fowers's twenty-five-year-old conviction for sodomy on a child and for failing to move for a mistrial in response to the prosecutor's comment during closing argument suggesting a relationship between Fowers's bisexuality and pedophilia. Fowers also argues that the trial court committed plain error and that defense counsel was ineffective in allowing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. GentryUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. MunguiaUtah Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  2. State v. KelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. State v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. EkstromCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API