Legal Opinion

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. American International Movers, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 12, 1981No. C81-316BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BEEKS, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, Sea-Land, seeks to recover freight allegedly due for shipment of cargo from Seattle to Helsinki. Sea-Land claims a balance due and owing of $1,137.40 on freight charges of $4,541.08 set forth in B/L # 992 755922. The printed terms provide,

CUBE UTILIZED: 54% OF TOTAL

CONTAINER

Cont. No. SEAU301704

SHIPPER’S LOAD & COUNT

Handwritten terms indicate cargo volume of 32.02 cubic meters, upon which charges for ocean freight, and an arbitrary, currency and bunker surcharges and a container yard terminal charge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Keith Adams & Associates, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birdsall, Inc. v. Tramore Trading Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  2. Phillips v. Mukluk Freight Lines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. International Paper Co. v. Transportes Navieros EcuatorianosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API