Legal Opinion
Menacho v. Adamson United Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 19, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-1514PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on motion for summary judgment by defendants Adamson United Company, United Engineering & Foundry Co., and Wean United, Inc., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Movants claim they cannot be held liable as a matter of law for the injuries sustained by plaintiff while cleaning a machine manufactured by movants’ predecessor. Plaintiff and defendant Zurn Industries, Inc. — Div. of EEMCO 1 contend that movants are either a continuation of, or a corporation created by merger with, the corporation that manufactured the machine which caused…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Stanley Knapp, Jr. v. North American Rockwell Corporation v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Ladjevardian v. Laidlaw-Coggeshall, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Lumbard v. Maglia, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Sweatland v. Park Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.