Legal Opinion

Hazelton v. Connelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Petitioner seeks an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, reinstating him to his former position as underwriting supervisor of the public agency known as the State Insurance Fund, and directing that he be recognized as an employee in good standing of said agency. The facts seem to be undisputed. The respondents raise a preliminary question as to whether a proceeding under article 78 is proper here. I believe it is, and hence will consider it on its merits.

On October 16, 1940, the petitioner was an employee of the State Insurance Fund, with the title of principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olmsted v. . DennisNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. STATE Ex STALEY v. LAKEWOOD (City) EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. In re CassedyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gelson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. DinowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Haynes v. McGrathNew York Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API