Legal Opinion

Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Dinowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is an application by the plaintiffs, Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund, for a preference pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 151 of the Buies of Civil Practice, which is a substantial embodiment of subdivision 1 of section 138 of the Civil Practice Act prior to its amendment (Welles v. Danin, 179 Misc. 268), and which provides that a preference shall be granted in “ An action or special proceeding brought by or against the people of the state, or a political *279subdivision of the state, or an officer or board of officers of the state or of a political subdivision of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. United States v. HerronSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Matter of Carnegie Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Matter of Atlas Television Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Goetschius v. BrightmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Geraud v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. United States v. Nebo Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950
  4. Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Riverhead Estates Civic Ass'n v. Gobron, New York County Courts1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API