W. C. Hines Co. v. Angell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Justice.
Action by lessee against its assignee to be reimbursed for rent paid. Plaintiff got the decision. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for amended findings or new trial.
March 20, 1928, plaintiff sold defendant its store in the city of Austin, plaintiff held the premises under a lease which covenanted not to assign “without first obtaining * * * written consent of the lessors.” If assigned without such consent, the lease stipulated that “neither acceptance of rent by the lessors from the lessee, or any other person, thereafter, nor failure on the part of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Cohen v. ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Keller v. HenvitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- McLaughlin v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- O'Neil v. A. F. Oys & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- First National Bank v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933