Legal Opinion
Foreman v. Hausman, No. Cv91-0396698 (Oct. 2, 1991)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 2, 1991No. CV91-0396698Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' REQUESTS TO REVISE Objections to Request to Revise paragraphs 3, 4, 9 and 10. Objections overruled.
Defendants' Request to Revise, paragraphs 3, 4, 9 and 10 seek to eliminate from plaintiff's complaint all references to alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Professional Responsibility (Rules and Code). The Rules and Code cannot form a basis to actions for civil liability.
The preamble to the Rules of Professional Conduct unambiguously…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- England v. Town of CoventrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Noble v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Leoni v. Water Pollution Control AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990