Legal Opinion

Norblad v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1908No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Delta; Stone, J. Case by Albín W. Norblad, administrator of the estate of Hamilton Langley, deceased, against the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway' Company for personal injuries. There was an order sustaining a demurrer to the declaration, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff’s intestate sustained injuries November 20, 1906 (from which he died later), while acting as locomotive fireman upon defendant’s railroad. The declaration filed in this cause, brought to recover damages for the injury, alleges defendant’s negligence, and that the plaintiff’s intestate lost gains and profits by loss of wages which would otherwise have accrued to him had he lived. It also claimed damages for expenses incurred for care, nursing, and medical attendance, for pain and suffering, etc. Defendant filed a demurrer, the substance of which is that the declaration is filed under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Olivier v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mok v. Detroit Building & Savings Ass'n No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Culpepper v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Walker v. Lansing & Suburban Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API