Legal Opinion

United States of America Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology v. Hercules, Inc., Vertac Chemical Corporation Department of Defense Dow Chemical Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Limited, Formerly Known as Uniroyal Limited, 1 Velsicol Chemical Corporation John Does, 1-5, Washington Legal Foundation John Doull, ph.d., M.D. Karl K. Rozman, ph.d. William J. Waddell, M.D. K. Roger Hornbrook, ph.d. Daniel M. Byrd, Iii, ph.d., D.A.B.T. Robert Golden, ph.d. B. Frank Vincent, ph.d. International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology American Council on Science and Health the Allied Educational Foundation Frank B. Cross Michael R. Fox, ph.d. Gary E. Marchant, Amici on Behalf of United States of America Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology v. Hercules, Inc., Vertac Chemical Corporation Department of Defense Dow Chemical Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Limited, Formerly Known as Uniroyal Limited, Velsicol Chemical Corporation John Does, 1-5, Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology v. Vertac Chemical Corporation Hercules, Inc., a Corporation, Washington Legal Foundation John Doull, ph.d., M.D. Karl K. Rozman, ph.d. William J. Waddell, M.D. K. Roger Hornbrook, ph.d. Daniel M. Byrd, Iii, ph.d., D.A.B.T. Robert Golden, ph.d. B. Frank Vincent, ph.d. International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology American Council on Science and Health the Allied Educational Foundation Frank B. Cross Michael R. Fox, ph.d. Gary E. Marchant, Amici on Behalf of United States of America, Vertac Chemical Corporation, Hercules, Inc., Dow Chemical Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Limited, Formerly Known as Uniroyal Limited, United States of America Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Hercules, Inc., Vertac Chemical Corporation Department of Defense Dow Chemical Corporation, Uniroyal Chemical Limited, Formerly Known as Uniroyal Limited, Velsicol Chemical Corporation John Does, 1-5

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 10, 2001No. 99-3684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

247 F.3d 706 (8th Cir. 2001)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLEES,

v.

HERCULES, INC., DEFENDANT/APPELLANT,

VERTAC CHEMICAL CORPORATION; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; DOW CHEMICAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS,

UNIROYAL CHEMICAL LIMITED, FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNIROYAL LIMITED,1 DEFENDANT/APPELLEE,

VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION; JOHN DOES, 1-5, DEFENDANTS.

WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION; JOHN DOULL, PH.D., M.D.; KARL K. ROZMAN, PH.D.; WILLIAM J. WADDELL, M.D.; K. ROGER HORNBROOK, PH.D.; DANIEL M. BYRD, III, PH.D., D.A.B.T.; ROBERT GOLDEN, PH.D.; B. FRANK…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States of America, State of New York v. Alcan Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API