Legal Opinion

Crockett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1943No. 10260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Northern Division, denying appellant’s petition to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S. C.A. § 8321 on a motion to vacate a judgment in which he was sentenced to twenty-five years in a penitentiary, which motion appellant claims is in the nature of a proceeding coram nobis.

Appellee contends that the order denying pauper relief is one entirely within the district court’s uncontrolled discretion and therefore there is no merit in the appeal.

We do not agree…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Steffler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SteeleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Application of Raymond C. HODGE, for Certificate of Probable CauseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Hurst v. ZarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API