Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kelly v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1943No. 10426Published

1ConcurrenceDenman, Circuit Judge

This is a motion in the nature of a pro-, ceeding coram nobis to set aside a sentence. It was filed as a part of the criminal proceeding in the district court below of United States v. Kelly, and is so entitled and numbered. The moving papers disclose that it was unknown to the district court when a plea of guilty was entered that certain facts existed which, if known to it, would have compelled the dismissal of the indictment.

These facts are that the thefts with violence were not of mail matter. The issue is presented whether it is the absence of the court’s knowledge of such facts which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Kelly v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Hall v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API