Green v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAllen, Judge
Although I agree that the appellant’s burglary conviction must be affirmed, I believe the appellant’s conviction for possession of burglary tools should be reversed. I would not construe the section 810.06 terms “tool, machine, or implement” to include a common glove.
Section 810.06, Florida Statutes, provides as follows:
*968Possession of burglary tools. — Whoever has in his possession any tool, machine^ or implement with intent to use the same, or allow the same to be used, to commit any burglary or trespass shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ex parte AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Ex Parte AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Brooks v. Anastasia Mosquito Control DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.