Legal Opinion
State v. Malm
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1956PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The petitioner, hereinafter called the plaintiff, brought a motion to the Superior Court under § 8268 of the General Statutes claiming a reward offered by the governor in the matter of State v. Malm (142 Conn. 113, 111 A.2d 685). Her motion was denied and she has appealed. The question is whether she fulfilled the terms of the offer for the reward.
On December 10, 1953, the body of Irene Fiederowicz was discovered in the rear yard of a dwelling house in the southwestern part of Hartford. She had been strangled by a scarf tied around her neck,, and it was suspected that she had been criminally…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atwood v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Shuey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Kinn v. First National Bank of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. Vernon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Smith v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Weingarten v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.