Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rankin v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1986No. D001838Published

1Dissent

*949STANIFORTH, Acting P. J., Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

In setting aside the entire order approving the “good faith” settlement, the majority engaged in an act of judicial overkill. They would disapprove of a $1,450,000 settlement—the sum total of all the settling parties’ available insurance policy limits. This settlement was reached as the result of lengthy negotiations with the help of a highly skilled, retired, “settlement” judge. It was approved by a trial judge after a hearing that complied insofar as the settling parties are concerned (and the record before this court) with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Singer Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API