Estate of Eisner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 210, Jan. T., 1896, by Sarab Eisner, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Oct T., 1885, No. 164, overruling exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 210, Jan. T., 1896, by Sarab Eisner, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Oct T., 1885, No. 164, overruling exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts appear by tbe adjudication of Penrose, J., which was as follows: The testator died October 19, 1884. By his will, proved November 3, 1884, he gave the residue of his estate to the accountant in trust to pay the net income and interest of the personal estate, and the net rents, issues and profits of the realty to his wife, Sarah Eisner, for life or during widowhood, and at the expiration of her estate to his…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The correctness of the decree from which this appeal was taken was amply vindicated by the learned auditing judge, whose opinion was adopted by the orphans’ court in banc. There is nothing in any of the questions involved that requires further elaboration. The decree is affirmed on the opinion referred to, and the appeal is dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Dickinson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Miller v. PayneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Gartenlaub v. Union Tr. Co. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Nirdlinger's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.