Legal Opinion
Zeigler v. Potter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 23, 2008No. Civil Action 06-1385(RMC)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff James E. Zeigler has asked the Court to clarify and/or reconsider the reliance it placed on his therapist’s September 21, 2001, letter to his employer, the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), in concluding that Mr. Zeigler was not “disabled” at that time within the meaning of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791, et seq. (2008). See Mem. Op. at 4-5 [Dkt. # 14]. 1 The Court will grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration [Dkt. #17].
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Zeigler is a Vietnam…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Stewart v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Murphy v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.